In One Word How Would You Decribe This Person?
I was watching a movie with a friend. It’s the harry potter and the chamber of secrets movie. You know that part where Ron stole the flying car? and they got caught by snape. Snape got a copy of the newspaper saying what happened on the same day at the event. And Jessi was yelling out, “What the hell?! How would the press know the same day of the event? AND HOW COULD SEVEN MUGGLES IN LONDON SEE A FLYING CAR?! THERE HAS TO BE ALOT MORE THAN THAT!! LIKE 25 OR SOMETHING. AND HOW WOULD THE PAPERS KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE SAW A FLYING CAR?!
(Order of the phoenix)And she kept on saying, there is no way a magic school could exist in the castle without the government noticing. And what about when the buildings split up, surely someone could have noticed that.
After the movie she yells out, this movie sucks, if they have to make a make believe story at least make it realistic.
You seen these kids shows when animals talk? She asks why the hell are animals talking. Animals can’t talk!
* 2 minutes ago
* – 3 days left to answer.
Additional Details
0 seconds ago
In one word how would you describe this person, In the movie theater she drives people nuts with her intelligence. people are going off saying that nobody likes a SmartAss. OrShut da F*ck up. I laughed at how annoyed everyone was, but why would any1 be annoyed?
How would you describe her? Why? Is it good or bad? Why?
If it’s bad how can i make her stop?
In One Word!!!!how Would You Describe This Person In Only One Word?
I was watching a movie with a friend. It’s the harry potter and the chamber of secrets movie. You know that part where Ron stole the flying car? and they got caught by snape. Snape got a copy of the newspaper saying what happened on the same day at the event. And Jessi was yelling out, “What the hell?! How would the press know the same day of the event? AND HOW COULD SEVEN MUGGLES IN LONDON SEE A FLYING CAR?! THERE HAS TO BE ALOT MORE THAN THAT!! LIKE 25 OR SOMETHING. AND HOW WOULD THE PAPERS KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE SAW A FLYING CAR?!
(Order of the phoenix)And she kept on saying, there is no way a magic school could exist in the castle without the government noticing. And what about when the buildings split up, surely someone could have noticed that.
After the movie she yells out, this movie sucks, if they have to make a make believe story at least make it realistic.
You seen these kids shows when animals talk? She asks why the hell are animals talking. Animals can’t talk!
In One Word How Would You Describe This Person?
I was watching a movie with a friend, I think its called The Wiz. When we went to the part with the scarecrow, who wanted a brain she was all, if the scarecrow doesnt have a brain how is he moving talking. And the tin man, who said he didnt have any feelings, then when she saw him cry and smile, she’s all That makes no sense, if the tin man had no feelings why did he cry.
In the harry potter movie we saw together, she annoyed everyone saying that there is no way a magic school can exist in a castle without the governemt noticing.
She was kind of annoying.
How would you describe this person? Is that a good thing or bad, how so?
In One Word How Would Best You Describe This Person?why?
I was watching a movie with a friend. It’s the harry potter and the chamber of secrets movie. You know that part where Ron stole the flying car? and they got caught by snape. Snape got a copy of the newspaper saying what happened on the same day at the event. And Jessi was yelling out, “What the hell?! How would the press know the same day of the event? AND HOW COULD SEVEN MUGGLES IN LONDON SEE A FLYING CAR?! THERE HAS TO BE ALOT MORE THAN THAT!! LIKE 25 OR SOMETHING. AND HOW WOULD THE PAPERS KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE SAW A FLYING CAR?!
(Order of the phoenix)And she kept on saying, there is no way a magic school could exist in the castle without the government noticing. And what about when the buildings split up, surely someone could have noticed that.
After the movie she yells out, this movie sucks, if they have to make a make believe story at least make it realistic.
You seen these kids shows when animals talk? She asks why the hell are animals talking. Animals can’t talk!
* 2 minutes ago
* – 3 days left to answer.
Additional Details
0 seconds ago
In one word how would you describe this person, In the movie theater she drives people nuts with her intelligence. people are going off saying that nobody likes a SmartAss. OrShut da F*ck up. I laughed at how annoyed everyone was, but why would any1 be annoyed?
How would you describe her? Why? Is it good or bad? Why?
If it’s bad how can i make her stop?
Does The Bible Need To Be Taken Literally Word For Word And Also Does It Need To Be Taken As Absolute Truth?
The Bible was written by men/humans who we all know we are liable to lie, exaggerate, invent, create and contrive stories. The Old testament was written at a time when before that for many centuries humans have made and worshipped all kinds of Gods to explain our being here, so it was no original idea by the time of the Old Testament of a God who ruled over man. IF the Old Testament had been the FIRST idea with claim of a God, it’s testament would stand stronger because the idea would have been original and then it wouldn’t have seem like somebody took one theory and then made it into another. But the fact is it wasn’t, it was an idea that tried and managed to rubbish all other previous similar ideas prior to that with the same initial idea of a God.
An example would be like an author who wrote a story about a little boy, dressed in blue who went to visit his granny, trekking through the woods met a grizzly bear who asked where he was going, the bear then proceeded toward the grannys house before the boy got there, ate the granny and dressed up in the grannys clothes to deceive the little boy whenever he would arrive. Then say, another author wrote a book quite similar only the boy was a girl, she was dressed in red and the grizzly bear was a wolf. I’m sure by now you see where I’m going with this, the ideas of the stories are similar but the problem is the second author couldn’t have come up with his story unless he was inspired by the previous authors ideas first, of course the story could change and take several u-turns but the same myth would still be there. Other stories can then be built around the second authors tale.
Also does every thing in the bible need to be taken literally? maybe I was educated badly in terms of religion, being born a catholic, in primary school we were taught that a lot of the stories in the bible like Adam and Even and Noahs Ark were all parables = stories with a moral meaning, that were not meant to be contrived as fact. So why do creationists and many Christians believe these to be actual accounts when we were taught otherwise?
As far as the New Testament goes it is my understanding that “Paul” was the first written account, but yet this wasn’t recorded until 30 to 40 years AFTER the supposed death of Jesus. That’s a long enough time for stories to change, if Jesus did exist how can you believe what is written down and what Jesus said is 100 percent accurate? Is it possible that these stories were invented, exaggerated or contrived? If Jesus did exist could he have been a David Blaine of his time? We’ve seen many magicians, illusionists, healers in ours, I mean it is possible. Inspiration can come from people who have the gift of persuasion, in opposite moral grounds Hitler managed to persuade his people into following his way of authority and the general German public bought it.
You can say it was prophesised in the Old Testament of Jesus coming, but how can it be prophecy when someone is acting out on something that was previously written down, this can easily just be acting on instruction.
After “Paul” did other people inspired by the story of Jesus start to add their own accounts in this continuation of his fact/fictional biography, inventing, exaggerating and contriving new tales? Again it’s plausible.
The bible was written in Greek and Hebrew, was there miscalculation in its translation? Morals passed off with misleading meaning? Even in its English form I have trouble interpreting Bible literature. Various Christian religions even have trouble coming to agreement with each other about many of the Bibles Teachings.
I don’t understand how Christians can take all of this as 100 percent accurate information when there is enough room for doubt about what is true and what is not true. Even historians can’t perceive 100 percent accuracy when studying the past as they can only take what information is given to them hoping that their conclusions is somewhat accurate although a lot of times, not entirely.
You can throw as many quotes from the bible at me referencing to prove me wrong and say it’s the word of God, but really it is NOT the word of God, it is mans supposed account of the word of God. God did not write the bible, neither did Jesus, men did, men as I already said who are liable to lie, exaggerate; contrive making the Bible plausible enough to not be true. God did not speak to YOU, he supposedly spoke to THEM, so you are left in a situation were you have to take THEIR word for granted, if you are happy to always rely on third party information as fact, well so be it.
From one story, inspiration can lead into creation of another story and what you are left with now is a Bible with many accounts of plausible lies, not trustworthy 100 percent accurate information, with stories so insane there is a helluva lot more reason to doubt rather than believe.
How Christians have a hard time understanding why atheists can lack or have little faith in believing the word of the bible is beyond me. When bibles terms come across like a con artist, have faith or be punished in the pits of hell, kind of seems like an immediate guilt trip forcing you into submission to believe everything it tries to preach.
I await to hear your answers and so I leave you with the words, “Do you always believe everything you read?”
What Is The Connotation Of Word “fatima” In This Sentence?why He Is Calling That Dwarf “little Fatima”
” I,ll quench the curiosity of this little Fatima, my dear Daisy, by
leaving her nothing to guess at.” David Copperfield page (308)
What’s The Word For A Book That’s Named After Its Main Character?
I’m trying to compare two texts for my coursework, and mentioning the protagonists’ names in each novel. Writing “David Copperfield, the protagonist in the novel, David Copperfield” sounds a bit stupid.
Is there a specific word?
